Search for: "People v. Givens" Results 2141 - 2160 of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled that people with mental retardation cannot be given the death penalty. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Paul Smith
The exercise of their freedom on terms equal to others must be given great weight and respect by the courts. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
Given that Google will almost certainly request a rehearing (and potentially ask the Supreme Court to hear this case), a retrial is unlikely to happen this year, but the most likely year for this is 2015. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
One day we were discussing Int'l Societyy for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
 The few people that may have heard of it (i.e. people who live near the mountain pass) are not the average consumer and not located in the EU. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:03 am by Kiran Bhat
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Midland Central Appraisal District v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
IP: the "no-patents round-up for non-techie people" -- today's conference organised by CLT and hosted in London's Grange Fitzrovia Hotel -- was opened by James Tumbridge (Pillsbury), speaking on trade mark and trade dress protection. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  Indeed, in almost 30 years of practice, the best advice I have ever been given about jury selection is to try to fill the box with a group of people who look like they cannot agree on anything, and then play for a hung jury. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
And they pride themselves on building things the people in their upstate New York community actually want and need. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:49 am by Legal Beagle
I believe that this censorship was draconian given that details of own case, Stott v Minogue 2000 SLT (Sh Ct) 25, & GWD 36-1386, - which spawned the petition – and the decision by the Social Security Commissioner, Ref: CS1/136/02. are in part matters of public record, or have been reported widely in the press and legal journals and are the two most important Scottish cases that deal with the influence of freemasonry in the justice system. [read post]