Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 3,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 7:59 pm
This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion authentic ryan kalil mens jersey “Aspiring journalist Brigid makes headlinesA LOVE of language and a nose for news has earned Brigid Auchettl this year’s The Standard Journalism Prize The details are part of a court filing explaining why a judge moved Kenan Adams Kinard, 16, to protective adult custody rather than returning him to juvenile detention before he and Demetruis Glenn, also 16, were formally charged… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
A Superior Court judge denied the defendant's motion to suppress the recording as the fruit of an unconstitutional search, and the defendant appealed. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
(Superior Court of San Diego County, No. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Superior Court of California. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:58 pm
” People v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:50 am
” In 1986 the Superior Court issued its ruling in Miller v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Riegel, the violation claims were dismissed on non-preemption grounds, and aren't before the Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Many people know that in Buck v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am
The Court of Appeal in City of San Jose v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
By Connor Moyle A recent appellate decision, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
FTC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:51 am
However, if he is convicted, prosecutors plan ...See all stories on this topic PEOPLE v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
Superior Court, where the Court held that “[b]ecause the plaintiff is not a California resident, California’s legitimate interests in the dispute have considerably diminished. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most cases are, by default, in the Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Cole of Manatt Phelps Phillips sent word of a Manatt client's recent victory in CKE Restaurant v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
