Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2017, 5:52 am by SHG
Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act….Rather than calling balls and strikes, Chief Justice Roberts was a 10th player, shifting the power structure toward the privileged and away from the average American. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
” At the Huffington Post, Lisa Schirch highlights what she describes as four “false assumptions” undergirding the Court’s decision in Holder v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In R v Operation Dismantle, the Court established that “political” questions are not immunized from Charter review.291 In NAPE, where the Newfoundland Court of Appeal invoked the principle of the separation of powers as a barrier to judicial interference with “policy initiatives within the purview of the political branches of government,”292 Justice Binnie responded for the majority: The “political branches” of government are the legislature and… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Wellner, 17-1318 Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts the Kentucky Supreme Court’s newly announced rule holding that a power of attorney authorizing the holder to enter into “contracts of every nature in relation to both real and personal property” does not encompass arbitration agreements because those agreements instead relate to rights to trial by jury and access to court. [read post]
Holder, Judge Chuang concluded that the organizational plaintiffs alleged a sufficient injury to their “proprietary and organizational interests. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
As we hope to demonstrate in “Democracy and Equality,” in our view, although the justices of the Warren Court often confronted problematic precedents, they had a deep understanding of the most fundamental reasons for judicial review and of the essential role of our Supreme Court in our constitutional system – most centrally, to make sure that majorities do not disregard the rights and interests of those without the political power to protect themselves, or abuse their… [read post]