Search for: "STATE v SCOTT"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 6,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
Scott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:49 am
Scott,450 F.3d 863 (U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:15 am
Jerry reveals: “The sexual harassment laws, of the United States at least, are purposely designed to protect employees and do not extend to independent contractors. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:00 pm
(See Elena Whitby v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 3:43 pm
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:41 am
In Hoffa v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
Maatman, Jr. and Scott Rabe “Sometimes surrender is the best option. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky discuss Davila v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
Joseph Scott Miller, United States Supreme Court Ip Cases, 1810-2019: Measuring & Mapping the Citation Networks, 69 Cath. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
In proceedings in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:17 am
Scott A. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy considers how last week’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
Scott Martin-MadridMan Websites, WIPO Case No. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:32 am
I've argued that this provision is unconstitutional, but no court has yet ruled on the question.In Dred Scott v Sanford, Chief Justice Taney argued that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect. [read post]
