Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2141 - 2160 of 6,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
The distinctive dog deviceAzumi Ltd v Zuma's Choice Pet Products Ltd [2017] EWHC 609 is a case about a dog's purpose. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General Szpunar (AG) has delivered his judgement in the case C‑434/15 Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:35 am
To the first question, this morning Advocate General (AG) Szpunar has provided a response in his Opinion in Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, C-434/15, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Spain (Juzgado Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona) [for an earlier and thorough analysis of this case, see here].The answer to the second question is that - depending on how Uber is classified - it can or cannot enjoy one of the founding freedoms… [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
 BREAKING: CJEU in Filmspeler rules that the sale of a multimedia player is a ‘communication to the public’IPKat Eleonora Rosati discusses the newly issued and meanwhile long-awaited CJEU’s decision in Filmpeler, C-527/15.Filmspeler, the right of communication to the public, and unlawful streams: a landmark decisionEver-productive Eleonora gives a more detailed review on the Filmspeler decision, and explains why it is a MAJOR copyright… [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm by Kluwer Blogger
A recent example of the court’s flexibility can be seen in Arnold J’s recent judgment in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Calculation of the actual damages resulting from Excalibre’s lost sales over the applicable 8.5 year period are to be determined in a separate reference. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:19 am by R. David Donoghue
Without evidence beyond UMG’s 1% of sales in the U.S. or more evidence of UMG’s deliberateness, the Court lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
Louis University School of Law invited me to deliver the 2017 Vincent C. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
"  The Hearing Officer upheld the opposition and refused to register the mark on the basis of the absolute grounds for refusal set out in section 3(1)(c) and (d) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 ("the TMA"). [read post]