Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
This holding drew a sharp rebuke from the four Justices on the dissent, who said, “Fair use is intended to allow individuals engaged in productive uses to copy small portions of original works that will facilitate their own productive endeavors. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm by Amul Kalia and Vera Eidelman
  Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
 There, the Supreme Court emphasized that debate on public issues `may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks’ on politicians. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Businesses strive to operate more efficiently in a climate of sharp increases in operating expenses such as electricity and water. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am by Cody Poplin
Hardline opponents of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani have responded with sharp criticism to his comments earlier this week; he had called hard-line politicians who oppose negotiations with the United States “cowards. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
In its complaint, Optical Devices relied exclusively on its agreements with various licensees, namely Sony Corporation, Sharp Corporation, and Sharp Electronics Corporation, to establish a domestic industry. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 8:19 am by J
The recent decision in Regent Wealth Ltd and others v Wiggins [2014] EWCA Civ 1078 is a clear reminder to practitioners to register notices under s.13, Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Glenn
Thus, false representations around a firm’s own, or it’s competitor’s, products can be legally actionable, as the Supreme Court again ruled this year in a case about beverage labeling (Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:44 pm
One is the comparison of challenges to prohibitions on same-sex marriage to challenges against bans on inter-racial marriage, which the Court put off deciding until Loving v. [read post]