Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
No state recognizes such a sweeping right of publicity that it is subject to zero countervailing First Amendment protections. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Under the old Code, there was a sharp difference of opinion amongst the various High Courts on the question as to whether the courts had an inherent power to pass an order of bail in anticipation of arrest, the preponderance of view being that it did not have such power. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:15 am
Currently,executions are stalled altogether, as states await a ruling in thelandmark Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:39 am by Eric Turkewitz
Addendum #2 (8/15/11): Just two weeks after putting up this post, the a Court of Claims judge found for the plaintiff in an attempted suicide case against the State (Acerbo v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:37 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy made in an opinion just last Term (Bond v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
My co-host, Geoff Sharp, in Wellington, New Zealand, is covering the Southern Hemisphere in his own edition of Blawg Review. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:14 am by Mark Keenan
In the Court of Appeal case of Sharp v Sharp, even though the marriage lasted around 6 years, it was still considered to be short enough to deviate from the 50:50 split. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:14 am by Mark Keenan
In the Court of Appeal case of Sharp v Sharp, even though the marriage lasted around 6 years, it was still considered to be short enough to deviate from the 50:50 split. [read post]