Search for: "Smith v. California"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 2,261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 6:08 pm
In California, intrastate sale of raw milk and raw colostrum is legal and regulated. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
California Date Growers Assn., 57 Cal. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
But Harris v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:26 am
BoydThe California Supreme Court has granted a petition for review in Schachter v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 11:13 pm
Relying on the California Supreme Court's statement in Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
Mike Smith of the AP wrote May 16th:INDIANAPOLIS - A California Supreme Court ruling allowing same-sex couples to marry in that state has renewed debate on whether Indiana should amend its constitution to ban gay marriage [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:47 am
v=LJda5OJep_8). [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:33 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ellis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
We return to our interview with Jonathan Pink, partner at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
But herewith the "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:35 am
Pink: The case is Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
Pink: The case is Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
V. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
Smith and Carafano v. [read post]
