Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
Today, we return to the United States to discuss the unusual case of Nickerson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
Golden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm
LOCKWOOD, MISS BELVA ANN BENNETT. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
13 Jul 2006, 7:16 am
In a criminal case, whether it be a state or Federal one, the case is "The People versus", or "The State versus," or even "The United States versus. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
United States Olympic Comm., 483 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:16 am
United Technologies Corp. 243. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 5:29 pm
See, Dewalt v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:01 am
Sure the Cartoon Network can appeal to the United States Supreme Court, but the question of direct copyright infringement is not the interesting one to pursue, and MIPTC predicts SCOTUS won't take TCN's petition for certiorari. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:59 am
However, the appeals court reversed and remanded this ruling by means of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
As part of the liberal quartet of the Supreme Court he had helped establish habeas corpus for terrorists captured overseas in 2006 and wrote a masterpiece of dissent in the recent Citizens United v F.E.C. - a case concerning corporate free speech in the tune of campaign dollars to candidates. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
Still missing is a decent conception of corporate personhood upon which to rest a clear legal conception of responsibility on the corporation. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:59 pm
MAPLES V. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:41 pm
Robinson and United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP exhibits all of the weaknesses and missed opportunities that has marked the NAP process for many developed states: it focuses on outward conduct and pays little attention to the human rights effects of economic activity within the United States; it is grounded in the prerogatives of executive command; it provides little assessment of the legal and remedial framework of the United States and its relationship to managing business conduct; and… [read post]
