Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 9,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held in Rivera v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am
State of California (Gaming Compacts – Good Faith Negotiations)James Raymond Acres v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
” Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black expressed his disappointment with these words in 1956, when he wrote the words in his dissent in the case, Federal Power Commission v. the Tuscarora Indian Nation (362 U.S. 99). [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
Black v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The question, then, in Hamm v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 8:36 am
Ibhawa is black and of Nigerian national origin. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Sewer v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:49 pm
A number of other well-known federal judges have done similar things, including Richard Posner in State Oil v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana October 7, 2019 – Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
In Magner v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:33 am
Hairston v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
United States, 506 U.S. 224, 232 (1993) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1113 (6th ed. 1990)). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
In Mastafa v. [read post]
