Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
I previously reported on a March 2009 appellate decision in a case called Yemini v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:26 am by David DePaolo
Hearing officers and the Appeals Panel are imposing an unreasonable burden of proof, based upon a 2010 Texas Supreme Court decision in Transcontinental v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
In response, the State argues that this issue was not adequately preserved for appeal and should therefore not be entertained by the court at this time. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
But that argument is effectively the same as the policy argument rejected by the New York Court of Appeals in First Financial Insurance Co. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred, in conflict with the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 10:51 am by Peter Groves
A Chancery Division judge has dismissed an appeal against a Master's refusal to give leave to serve Google outside the jurisdiction . [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm by Florian Mueller
I also asked the Munich Higher Regional Court about the status of Apple's appeal of the injunctions, but received no new information. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:18 pm by The Complex Litigator
April 6, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) affirmed a trial court order denying certification to three subclasses of managerial employees at El Torrito restaurants. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
C.P.R, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 359: The second question passed on by the Appeal Division dealt with the interpretation of s. 16 of the Act which reads :â€â [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
My friend Sam Bray is correct that "Democratic state attorneys general seek national injunctions in friendly district courts," but as best as I can recall, Democratic Attorney Generals do not seek nationwide injunctions in single judge divisions–they don't have to. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference, the complaint states a legally cognizable cause of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Guayara v Harry I. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for [read post]