Search for: "State v. Ford" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
” Whether a former president should ever have the unilateral power to assert executive privilege over the objection of the incumbent remains an unsettled issue, as the Supreme Court recently recognized in Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
” However, Ford was plainly wrong about the Founders’ understanding of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and about the precedent created by subsequent impeachment cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:01 am by Sarah Harrison
” The operative language of the executive order requires “a 90-day pause in United States foreign development assistance for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Gender violence happens no matter what the circumstances are, including all the harms that were increased by the pandemic.I always teach United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Notwithstanding Premier Doug Ford’s commitment to “fix the process” and statements from Attorney General Doug Downey that there would be a public application process in the future, there were no additional King’s Counsel designations in 2024 and, to my knowledge, the [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by Edward J. Balleisen
Supreme Court has more consistently restricted the interpretive flexibility of agencies, especially in some pivotal environmental cases such as West Virginia v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]