Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 2141 - 2160
of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
By Dennis Crouch Nordock v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court decision in FEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
”Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:10 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
The authors give positive weight to states' willingness to issue drivers' licenses to undocumented immigrants (under their "travel freedom" variable), but overlook this even more significant state-level immigration policy. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 8:29 am
Green v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court has granted the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:28 am
In Thompkins v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
The problem is that cutting off the states and cities and leaving them to suffer for their supposed irresponsibility will hurt everyone in every state and city, because when states cut services and lay off workers, that has direct impacts and ripple effects that harm us all, everywhere in the country—a country that already has Depression-level unemployment and is getting worse every day.Moreover, the presumption that the Republican-led states are… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
All casebooks will prominently feature discussions of the ambiguous passages in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
Should the program bring in revenues at this level, the Illinois experience could be the catalyst for other cash-strapped states to legalize video poker. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
Lewis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
Even if Mr Lloyd could establish the requisite level of harm, the “same interest” test was not met because the impact was not uniform across the class. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
