Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 2141 - 2160 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
The Court of Appeal disagreed: Airbus v Patel [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 8; but then the House of Lords agreed with Colman J, holding in effect that the English courts should not act as the world's policemen where a non-contractual anti-suit injunction was sought, as this would be contrary to the principle of comity: Airbus v Patel [1999] 1 AC 119. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am by Eduardo Ustaran and Sam Choi
The bill is currently at the beginning of the parliamentary process, with the first reading in the House of Lords held on September 13, to be followed by a second reading scheduled for October 10. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Barrister Keir Monteith, for Norman, told the three-judge panel, led by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, that the appeal hinged on the decision of Mirror Group Newspapers to “give up” details of the prison officer. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
But no UK patent ruling has ever been even remotely as controversial as Justice Colin Birss's 2017 holding in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:37 pm
Ltd & Rhodia Operations S.A.S. v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Limited & Neo Performance Materials Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, Lord Camden, rejected this argument with flourish. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
  ♫ Oh, Lord, stuck in a lawsuit again. ♫Fraud. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
I regarded the appeal as having merit and I also considered that it would give this court the opportunity to give any necessary guidance as to the limits of the application of the observations of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
I regarded the appeal as having merit and I also considered that it would give this court the opportunity to give any necessary guidance as to the limits of the application of the observations of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v. [read post]