Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 21,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Gelbach states his claim in the context of discussing a single randomized controlled trial (ASCOT-LLA), but his broad pronouncements are carelessly framed such that others may take them to apply to a single observational study, with its greater threats to internal validity. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm
John's Law Review Symposium: 40th Anniversary of Plyler v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
On this point, the Court of Appeal chose a test different from the one applied at first instance, applying the test from the Supreme Court decision in the case of Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Group Litigation v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am
GuestKat Tian Lu discussed background of the case and provided a comment on the outcome of the decision and the assessment of deceptiveness of marks in light with the Trade Mark Law of China (TMLC) (see here).GuestKat Hayleigh Bosher reported on the case of the company Fizzy Foam, a trade mark owner that surrendered some of its registered marks, even though they were accepted by the UKIPO after receiving reactions on the Internet and a petition against their… [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 1:08 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Holder (2009) (quotation marks omitted)…. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 pm
Noonan -- For most of the past decade, the Supreme Court has been marking out the metes and bounds of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's execution of the post-grant review provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, particularly with regard to inter partes reviews (see "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 12:03 pm
Because the Baker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am
As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
United States Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:06 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:44 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
That is why the shareholders sued the directors in the Golden, rather than the Silver, state. [read post]
