Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm
The case of Yvietta Matison v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 6:53 am
Furthermore, Wreal identified two consumers purpotedly confused by Amazon’s mark (Wreal, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
”We deeply hope that state legislatures will not follow Mark Levin and Donald Trump, Jr. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
BP failed on both counts at first instance but the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland decided that the marks were valid and enforceable and that trade mark infringement had occurred (BP Amoco plc v John Kelly Ltd [2002] F.S.R.5). [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
By Mark SpringIn 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm
October 1st marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court term. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Cir. 1984); Quaker State Oil Reining Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm
Caliber Automotive Liquidators, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:05 pm
MARK L MCLAURIN; TAWANA MCLAURIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
State, 193 N.J. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
In fact, the allegations either state directly, or create a strong inference, that the purpose of Defendants’ use of the marks is to disparage Plaintiff and endorse Regal. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
” Dickerson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
In Calcano v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am
Board of Education, on the constitutionality of racial segregation in state school systems; and a memorandum on a federal case, Bolling v. [read post]
