Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 36,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Here is the question presented as stated in the cert. petition: In Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
McPherson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:35 pm
Since the 2005 decision, 40 states have passed legislation limiting the state government’s power of eminent domain for economic development. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:42 am
Hartford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am
(This is a variant on Judge Friendly's 1970 proposal and an extension of Stone v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
In State of North Carolina v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
Veterans v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm
This post analyses the decision and its possible impact on contract law and the electricity sector in India.Brief FactsMundra Ultra Mega Power Project (“MUMPP”) was conceived to be a huge power project which was to supply power to at least three states- Gujarat, Haryana and Rajasthan through the state power procurers. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm
This post analyses the decision and its possible impact on contract law and the electricity sector in India.Brief FactsMundra Ultra Mega Power Project (“MUMPP”) was conceived to be a huge power project which was to supply power to at least three states- Gujarat, Haryana and Rajasthan through the state power procurers. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 2:44 pm
§ 401(a)(1); Alcoa Power Generating Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:59 pm
There are many different angles from which someone could attack the majority opinion issued today in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:18 pm
It was not until NFIB v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
And, it may also be important that judicial review of a refusal to authorise is no longer available following the decision of the Supreme Court in A, R (on the application of)v B [2009] UKSC 12 (summery here) but rather to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Howard Marshall to the endless litigation (the fictional Jarndyce v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 12:07 pm
I've uploaded a copy of the defense motion to dismiss in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 3:14 pm
Undoubtedly the President... is imbued with vast and indispensable powers... including the duty to protect this country from foreign aggression or subversion. [read post]
