Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 8:04 am
Supreme Court at the top, lower state courts at the bottom.)You also get an overarching context and trend analysis for the history of campaign finance litigation.Statutes the Next Frontier: Since Fastcase is pulling statutes from free state websites which are not universally reliable or current (even though published on the states official Websites),  I don’t see Fastcase as ready for ‘prime time” in statutory research arena. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
United States Don Blankenship, the former chief of Massey Energy who unsuccessfully attempted to run for Senate in West Virginia two years ago, has received the green light to proceed in a defamation suit that blames a number of individuals and media organizations for his political loss. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Esposti and her coauthors compared 23 states that have enacted such laws, known as stand your ground laws, with 18 states that do not have stand your ground laws. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
With its attention focussed on the 2004 Directive, the Asylum and Immigration Appeal Tribunal ruled in LC v Secretary of State for the Home Department that, despite having been in the UK for 19 years, Chindamo had “resided” in the UK within the meaning of the Directive for less than 10 years, as 10 of those years had been spent in prison. [read post]