Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 43,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:48 am
In Arista Records v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
FOIL imposes a broad duty on government to make its records available to the public", citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267., said FOIL provides that, "unless otherwise specifically exempted, all records of a public agency are presumptively open to public inspection and copying". [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
FOIL imposes a broad duty on government to make its records available to the public", citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267., said FOIL provides that, "unless otherwise specifically exempted, all records of a public agency are presumptively open to public inspection and copying". [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
In the context of a public agency seeking an injunction to prohibit repeated requests for public records by an inmate of a state prison, a court is permitted to consider the identity of a person making a Public Records Act (PRA) request. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
"] From today's decision of the Florida Court of Appeal in Doe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:29 pm
After the agreed statement of facts was read into the record, counsel for Ward made a motion for judgment of acquittal. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm
As Bob McCarty reports here, ACCA today rejected the appeal and petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
In Pineda v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:51 pm
In Fernald v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 am
The Court agreed, noting that the skimpy record below gave little reason to overturn the judge's decision below in denying the TRO, given the petitioner's burden to prove 1) the likelihood that the petitioner would succeed on the merits, 2) the 'balance of inconvenience' between granting or denying the TRO, 3) the petitioner would suffer irreparable injury, and 4) the public interest.The Court also rejected the petitioner's argument that Lamb v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:55 am
Where, however, there is an apparent inconsistency in the verdicts at a nonjury trial, but where the trial judge on the record satisfactorily explains the apparent inconsistency, the guilty verdict may stand. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:10 am
Wilner (retired, specially asigned).From the headnote of the opinion:Before a restitution order is granted, Section 11-603 of the Criminal Procedure Article requires that the victim of the crime or the State request restitution and that competent evidence supporting the amount of the restitution order be presented to the trial court. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Colvin, June 12, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
State, 176 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
State, 176 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
The record on appeal in this case indicates that all three requirements were met. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:45 pm
The audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are available to the public at the end of each argument week. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Avila v. [read post]
