Search for: "State v. Sharp" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
The big case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States this past week, at least for patent attorneys like the host of last week's Blawg Review #106, was KSR v Teleflex. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 9 March Mrs Justice Sharp granted a privacy injunction to restrain the publication of a range of information which tended to identify the claimant and which related to the subject matter of the action. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
He also recited the administration’s new “priorities” that had led to the sharp increase in deportation of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am by Charon QC
’ Given that, in this case, the victims of insurers’ sharp practice were people who had paid their own insurers for cover, imagine how unrepresented victims who make a claim against insurers will be treated. [read post]