Search for: "State v. Taylor" Results 2141 - 2160 of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
Taylor (07-539). ** Whether it is unconstitutional for a state — here, Illinois — to ban the production of a food item, if all of the product is exported to other countries. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
However the rule is substantially similar to the federal rule, and so here's the Ninth Circuit's take on the issue (from Taylor v. [read post]
Authors: Liz Hastilow, Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Steven Li, Liam Mackay and Mia Blundell. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
Taylor, 20-1459, the government has brought its own petition; in Dominguez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:35 am by William Weinberg
Mosley (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1044, 1080 [2]  In re Taylor (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1019 [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 am
Jackson and State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
 But in the field of artistic works and copyright infringement, the effects of papercuts run deeper, as is apparent in the recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales in Taylor v Maguire, in a case for copyright infringement in works produced by the method of papercutting. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In analyzing whether the plaintiff is entitled to the information it seeks, the starting point of inquiry is CPL 720.35(2) which provides: Except where specifically required or permitted by statute or upon specific authorization of the court, all official records and papers, whether on file with the court, a police agency or the division of criminal justice services, relating to a case involving a youth who has been adjudicated a youthful offender, are confidential and may not be made available to… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am by Kristin Johnson
And, at the core of this case, “…the right to convey core political messages on trademarks” as stated by Elster’s counsel Jon Taylor. [read post]