Search for: "State v. White"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 13,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am
Further case law has also illustrated that the attractiveness of a design, the intentions of the author, the design’s visual effect, symbolism and commercial success in the marketplace will not be factors in a finding of eligibility for copyright protection (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).In relation to derivative works, it is stated that the registration of such works would not cover any previously published or registered works (17 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
" State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:05 pm
Foreman v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
The case, of course, is Miranda v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:13 pm
Georgia, Coker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:41 pm
The Sixth Circuit court of appeals, in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Given the current climate, hate speech prosecutions will probably become more common in the United States soon. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Whiting and Arizona v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:13 am
After Harris v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 am
Kennedy-Western UniversityCA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM [image credit: Shutterstock - Matthew Cole - "Illustration of a Honey Bee on a White Background"] [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Carroll Robinson, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 8:21 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:47 am
Erfe (RLUIPA) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlCora G. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
White, decided by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (which eventually became the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:14 pm
Whiting and the opinion is here.SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
