Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 8,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2007, 4:43 am
Levine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
See Arnold v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:06 pm
In a recent New Jersey Case, Bermeo v Bermeo, the court decided whether or not to increase alimony payments after a property settlement agreement. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:22 am
Emerson Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:38 am
In the case of Jarden, the chancery court reasoned that the deal price was an unreliable indicator of fair value because Jarden’s CEO acted with little oversight and volunteered an acceptable price range before negotiations really began (Fir Tree Value Master Fund, LP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 6:25 am
The award was for listing Abanka's shares on the Ljubljana stock exchange in 2008. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:29 pm
This sort of gag order is a pretty clear First Amendment violation, much like in the McCauley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:01 am
The taxpayer in Cung v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:28 am
But the statements were of fact, not opinion, and the verdict had a sufficient basis, the court reasoned (SEC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:18 am
In short, the only party who stood to gain if the stock price went up was CGMI. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 10:56 am
In the district court, Korchevsky was convicted of, among other things, conspiracy to commit securities fraud and computer intrusions and securities fraud; the Second Circuit upheld Korchevsky’s several convictions (Korchevsky v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:14 am
If you think about it honestly, without a bone to pick dependent on which side of the “v” you normally sit, this was an important and beneficial development for ERISA plans, and not just for litigation, but also for designing and running benefit plans: we now know, but did not before, exactly the context in which holding employer stock in a falling market can and cannot give rise to fiduciary liability. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:48 am
On remand, the district court should consider all record evidence relevant to the impact (or lack thereof) of Goldman’s statements on its stock price (Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:56 am
While the plaintiffs’ fiduciary duty claim had merit—the plaintiffs’ allegations would have warranted enhanced scrutiny under Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
The court deemed the shares voted in favor of the amendment and declared the amendment to have been approved, subject to the plaintiff completing a stock split (Texas Pacific Land Corporation v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
., Investors' Exchange LLC, and MEMX LLC (The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:41 am
The court found that the complaint failed to show that Kohl's and the officer defendants either knew information that contradicted their public statements or that they were motivated to keep stock prices artificially high while they sold their own shares (Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
In Gibbons v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:39 am
All of the defendants’ stock sales during the class period were made pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, and the plaintiffs did not show that the stock sales were dramatically out of line with prior trading practices at times calculated to maximize the personal benefit from undisclosed inside information. [read post]
