Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 1:19 pm
Overjet, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
The rate goes up to 49.71¢ per employee for 2010-2014. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The line-up of justices was therefore essentially the same as the 7-2 opinion in Eldred v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
Mystery Ranch, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But it wasn't just technology vs content: two major platforms, Spotify and Deezer, urged European legislators to ensure that the globally dominant giant US technology companies (primarily Apple, Amazon and Google) don't abuse their position as gatekeepers to digital consumers, not least as all three tech giants make and operate devices, control transaction platforms and own content services. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm
Or consumers might get hit with fees after they have already sunk costs into a product or service, and they can’t easily walk away.Surprise charges that secretly push up the purchase price: Consumers can experience junk fee shock when companies unexpectedly tack on mystery charges they did not know about, consent to, or factor into the purchase. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
He noted that copyright protection was initially limited, but then the protected works expanded to align more with the works protected in European countries. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
Va. 2010), that court held that, as a matter of statutory interpretation and fundamental policy, “[t]he private cause of action afforded consumers under West Virginia [consumer protection act] does not extend to prescription drug purchase. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
[1] McLeod v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:00 am
Take, for example, the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/EJ0REMiRci -> The Google Class Action Scam Continues at Scale http://t.co/Asm6IqL88O -> CBA National Magazine – Taking down the hackers http://t.co/xpRjkYM3vE -> Facebook ‘likes’ as protected speech (more) http://t.co/zevcoMxDok -> Blogspot Gets Section 230 Win In 11th Circuit–Dowbenko v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Such standards will determine how much legislation succeeds in shifting the focus from consumer choice to business behavior and thereby enables individuals to trust that personal information will be protected regardless of what notices they manage to read, pop-up windows they click through or privacy settings they adjust. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
A sketchy business model + a litigation shop that isn't very good at litigation = one dead start-up. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
The Justices, taking up the case of Michigan v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decision in Clark v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
We found that the vast majority of consumers didn’t understand that they were signing up for a fee-based program or that their credit cards would be charged. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Copyright trolling: buying up (or not!) [read post]
