Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 5,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Upon consultation with Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
At least the Supremes did their part by giving us a light week on the relist front: All last week’s relists hung around for another week, and only two new cases joined the rolls. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” Justin Marceau analyzes Tuesday’s argument in Hughes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
FTI Consulting, Murphy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
She was an independent beauty consultant for Mary Kay Cosmetics; a guest service captain for Miami Dolphins and University of Miami Hurricanes football games, concerts and special events held at Sun Life Stadium; an event coordinator for Bubblegum Event Planning; and for a brief period of time, a front desk receptionist for a health office. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Today’s second argument is in China Agritech v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” EJI focuses on this week’s cert denial in Hidalgo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
” Barbara Kaiser, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
If that sounds vaguely familiar to you, there’s a reason for that: Serial relist Sykes v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
As Breyer put it – after tossing off references to three continental treatises he had consulted before the argument – “if you were to have a quiz – ‘What was the law of sovereign immunity in 1760? [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:46 am
For that reason, IBM’s diversity-related trade secrets are of no value to Microsoft and they will not be able to use the new role acquired, Bloomberg reported citing her lawyers. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
Claims for legal malpractice are subject to a three-year statute of limitations and accrue when the malpractice is committed, not when the client learns of it (Lincoln Place, LLC v RVP Consulting, Inc., 70 AD3d 594 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 710 [2010]; CPLR 214 [6]). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm
" Whenever you see a case like State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
The legislation to authorize DHS has taken three years to hammer out, with considerable difficulty. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:11 am
You can call us at 800-553-8082 or click here for a free online consultation. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
