Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
” Furnes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Indeed, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims specifically asked for guidance from the Supreme Court on this issue. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:01 pm
Paul, 274 F.3d 155 (5th Cir. 2001) (3 year ban), or scope, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:02 am
Stevic and INS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Vogle v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:21 am
On March 27, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a precedential decision in Knepper v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.No. 09-6072UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT11a0293p.06; 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
” Kappos v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Case date: 14 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-3369 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 am
In Viet v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Emory Healthcare Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Emory Healthcare Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:39 am
This morning, the Fourth Circuit handed down its ruling affirming the contempt sanctions, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 6:07 pm
CAAF has released an opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 1:30 pm
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
June 27, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the tolling rule established by the United States Supreme Court in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
