Search for: "United States v. James" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington noted that U.S. courts simply don't rule on foreign patents, citing one case in which a U.S. district court declined to do so even though both parties asked for a determination involving a foreign patent.Lord Kitchin is not among the three Supreme Court judges hearing the case now. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
Co. v Goldfarb (53 NY2d at 401), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the proposition that where an insurer may face liability based upon some of the grounds for recovery asserted but not upon others, the insured defendant is entitled to be represented by an attorney of his or her own choosing at the expense of the insurer (see Prashker v United States Guar. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am by Scott Dodson
When the United States is not a party, the solicitor general does occasionally file amicus briefs on behalf of the United States in cases involving rule interpretation. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Meanwhile, Russia’s anger has also been roused by the United States’s activation of a missile defense site in Romania. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:03 pm by James McComish
Alberta Court Analyzes Public Policy Defence In Bad Ass Coffee Company of Hawaii Inc. v.... [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
McKinnon, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison: Geopolitics and Human Rights Rhetoric in Recent Mexican LGBT Asylum Cases in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
 As Wikipedia explains, “impeaching” a witness “in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual who is testifying in a trial. [read post]