Search for: "WEST v. STATE"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 8,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Tharp v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:18 am
Advanced Display Technologies of Tex, LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:04 pm
It is among our Nation’s proudest boasts that, '[i]f there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in [matters of] religion.' West Virginia State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Hempstead v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
Original Post The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running Yousoufian v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
See Lazovitz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm
Here is the United States’ press release: JOINT STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REGARDING STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE V. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:22 am
See also, State v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:55 pm
Div. 2008) (quoting State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Abbott Picayune Rancheria v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
City of Detroit to the Supreme Court’s 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:53 am
First, as the Supreme Court just recently stated in Lackey v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:31 am
Now, in Higgins v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” In various judgments, such as Paschim v State of West Bengal, State of Punjab v Mohinder and Parmanand v Union of India, the Supreme Court of India has continually interpreted Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution to include the right to health. [read post]
