Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 7:24 am by Dennis Crouch
United States highlights the longstanding difficulty in defining regulatory taking as well as determining when a regulatory takings claim becomes ripe for judicial review. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the casino was only “theoretically” capable of maritime transport because it is: indefinitely moored to the land by lines tied to steel pilings. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
Or, more accurately, does the United States, in particular, have jurisdiction to punish pirates for offenses committed on the high seas? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
  The statute says that state law is preempted when a crash occurs "on the high seas beyond three nautical miles from the shore of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Indeed, Sirius states that Alaniz now alleges that all sixteen apartment units have extensive property damage from water intrusion. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Indeed, Sirius states that Alaniz now alleges that all sixteen apartment units have extensive property damage from water intrusion. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:20 pm
The State did not agree with the defense’s characterization that the court declared a mistrial sua sponteAs noted by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 8:36 am by Famighetti & Weinick
The United States Supreme Court first established the exception in 2012, in a case known as Hosanna-Tabor. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 Justice Alito wrote a longer concurrence bitterly complaining about the failure of Congress, EPA, and the Corps of Engineers to give clear guidance as to what constitutes “waters of the United States” under the CWA, leaving property owners to “feel their way” and ever fear that EPA will issue a compliance order against them for alleged CWA violations. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:09 am by Robert Kreisman
In the complaint it was alleged that the unit flooded several times;   they also discovered that the promised inspection and repair work that would have eliminated the water hazard had not been done by Wolcott. [read post]