Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2141 - 2160 of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm by Orin Kerr
Randy’s argument is more or less the one Justice Scalia makes in his concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
Abbott and Gould were typical Supreme Court cases in another way, as well. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Recently, the Fourth District addressed this issue as a matter of first impression in Bolger v. [read post]
On 7 June 2023, Mr Justice Marcus Smith handed down judgment with his FRAND determination.[1]  This is the second judgment issued by the English Courts containing a substantive FRAND determination since the pivotal judgment of the UK Supreme Court in 2020 in Unwired Planet (the first being the judgment of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo earlier this year). [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
The fate of public-sector unions is in the Court’s hands this term as well, and again the Trump administration has urged it to depart from precedent. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
The February sitting is now well underway. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am by Kevin Johnson
  Justice Kagan cited Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by Steve Hall
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The case is Esper v NHS North West London Integrated Care Board [2023] EWCOP 29; [2023] WLR(D) 300, and is a decision of Mr Justice Poole. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE case law by the European Court of Justice, andthe jurisdictional clarification provided by China's top court in OPPO v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am by Jack Ballantyne, Olswang LLP
  On the legal issues alone, Miller represents a significant decision on the prerogative of Parliament and Government to alter the rights of British citizens and it could well be the case that defines the Supreme Court for years to come. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:36 am
Sometimes I critique -- good-naturedly, of course -- the Ninth Circuit for dispensing justice a bit slowly. [read post]