Search for: "Abid v. Abid"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2014, 10:23 pm
What makes such Industry Standard Practices and Commercially Reasonable Efforts so promisingly effective is that: They were approvingly cited as source of guidance as to what a business must do to properly protect its customers’ data, by the court in the case entitled, The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:47 am
From United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
Perhaps the best guidance as to what your business must do comes from the Wyndham case we have spent so much time analyzing, which officially is entitled, The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In one of the latest decisions handed down in the Commonwealth in the context of insurance bad faith litigation, Judge Jeffrey Sprecher of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas has doled out an $18 million dollar award against Nationwide Mutual Insurance along with an award of $3 million in attorney's fees in the case of Berg v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:25 am
Monday’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am
In describing Posner’s challenge to the puzzle, Will Baude refers to Justice Scalia’s concurrence in California v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
Sounds a little like Eliot Ness v. spam … Compliance: “If you abide by the law you have nothing to fear. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Justice Scalia has a well-known opinion (his concurrence in California v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:35 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:14 am
Thus, it found that the failure of the district court and the litigants to abide by the class settlement procedures of Rule 23(e) did not invalidate the Dismissal. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm
” EPA, it held, must abide by the statute: “An agency has no power to ‘tailor’ legislation to bureaucratic policy goals by rewriting unambiguous statutory terms. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
This morning, the Supreme Court granted cert in DOT v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Mishra v State, (Orissa High Ct., June 20, 2014), the High Court of the Indian state of Orissa held that the state government must abide by the decision of the Managing Committee of the Jagnnath Temple in maintaining law and order during Rath Yatra (CarFestival). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:14 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:03 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
They’ve created a Catch-22 for law-abiding citizens. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:01 pm
See also Grievance Administrator v Fieger, 476 Mich 231, 250-252; 719 NW2d 123 (2006). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
” In Tupper v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:29 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
