Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 2161 - 2180 of 9,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Martha McSally of Arizona to criminalize domestic terrorism. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruled in the Citizens United case to uphold public disclosure, with Justice Antonin Scalia arguing later that without such revelation “democracy is doomed,” Republicans and wealthy allies have argued it results in donor harassment and has a chilling effect on free speech. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
 President Obama made two nominations for the seat, each of which were blocked in the Senate, including former North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Patricia Timmons-Goodson. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:43 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
Anyway, also in the fall of 2017, the Vermont Supreme Court exercised original jurisdiction as it is occasionally apt to do, and published an opinion with respect to an attorney discipline issue. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Circuit, which in turn is subject to review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:12 am by Sara E. Teller
Arizona decides to take its allegations against Purdue and the Sacklers directly to the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf explains why Arizona’s attempt “to sue members of the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma in the US Supreme Court … in the first instance is problematic. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:22 am by Adam Steinman
This week Arizona filed a bill of complaint (and a motion for leave to file that bill of complaint) in the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Brian Morris ruled the agency did not give proper public notice before it stopped requiring social-welfare groups, labor unions, and business associations to identify donors contributing more than $5,000. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that, “[s]aying the opioid crisis requires bold measures, the state of Arizona filed an audacious lawsuit in the Supreme Court on Wednesday asking the justices to order members of the Sackler family, which owns Purdue Pharma, to return what the state said were billions of dollars looted from the company. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:50 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court’s help to take money from family behind opioid drugmaker”: Andrew Oxford of The Arizona Republic has this report. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:35 pm by Laura Freid-Studlo
Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can access $2.5 billion in Defense Department funds to replace and enhance sections of barrier along the southern border in Arizona, California and New Mexico. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 11:10 am by Howard Bashman
Arizona Files Novel Lawsuit in Supreme Court Over Opioid Crisis”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
Only the Supreme Court can fix this problem, which exists because the Ninth Circuit simply refuses to apply Supreme Court precedents on this matter.* The defendants in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Edmund LaCour
Arizona, which concerns (1) whether courts that are correcting a defendant’s sentence must apply current law, and (2) whether resentencing must be performed in the trial court. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The conservative members of the Supreme Court edged closer to eliminating the separation of church and state in the Court’s recent decision American Legion v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:06 pm by Howard Bashman
“Gay discrimination case pending in Supreme Court unusually long time”: Dillon Rosenblatt of the Arizona Capitol Times has an article that begins, “Dissent among Arizona Supreme Court justices in a gay discrimination case could be why they still have not issued a ruling since oral arguments six months ago, an Arizona State University law professor said. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:00 am by Neoshia Roemer
Required Qualifications: Applicants should be licensed to practice in Nevada or in another state and eligible for admission pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 72.1. [read post]