Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 2161 - 2180 of 3,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
For the purposes of this Article, an offense shall be an extraditable offense: (a) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (b) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign commerce, such matters being… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
For the purposes of this Article, an offense shall be an extraditable offense: (a) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (b) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign commerce, such matters being… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm by familoo
It is a matter of long established public policy that marriage is not a contract in any straightforward sense. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Pursuant to R 103(2) it is the board of appeal which would have been competent to deal with the substantive issues of the appeal if no interlocutory revision had been granted that is competent to decide on the request (G 3/03 [answers 1 and 2]). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
  What is clear is that the current state of law raises what former federal prosecutor and conservative legal analyst Andrew C. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
In its decision, the SJC noted that “‘[g]enerally, under Massachusetts law, defense counsel’s failure to inform a defendant of collateral or contingent consequences of a plea does not render a plea involuntary[,]’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
In its decision, the SJC noted that “‘[g]enerally, under Massachusetts law, defense counsel’s failure to inform a defendant of collateral or contingent consequences of a plea does not render a plea involuntary[,]’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Hunter Biederman
It seated a third grand jury for the current term. c. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:12 am by Cathy Holmes
Within the Investment Capital Law Group, Cathy focuses on business formations for entrepreneurs, private securities offerings, structuring and offering of private investment funds, and business and regulatory matters for investment bankers, investment advisers, securities broker-dealers and real estate/mortgage brokers. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:12 am by Cathy Holmes
Within the Investment Capital Law Group, Cathy focuses on business formations for entrepreneurs, private securities offerings, structuring and offering of private investment funds, and business and regulatory matters for investment bankers, investment advisers, securities broker-dealers and real estate/mortgage brokers. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:32 pm by Ryan Venables
s. 210. (1) Every one who keeps a common bawdy-house is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (2) Every one who is an inmate of a common bawdy-house, is found, without lawful excuse, in a common bawdy-house, or as owner, landlord, lessor, tenant, occupier, agent or otherwise having charge or control of any place, knowingly permits the place or any part thereof to be let or used for the purposes of a common bawdy-house, is guilty of an offence… [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm by Allison McClure
This often involves coming to an agreement on property division, child support, and other financial matters. b. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 4:40 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
States including Florida (Rule 4-7.12(c)), Nevada (Rule 7.2(h)), and Texas (Rule 7.02(d)) explicitly state this requirement in their ethics rules. [read post]