Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 2161 - 2180 of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 3:43 am by Dennis Crouch
I’m not saying there aren’t any, but the flow of cases that come through this court at three or four hundred a year, it is exceedingly rare that the patent office hangs its case on written description. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Andrew Kent
Circuit, for example, holds that when a lower court “set[s] aside” a federal agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  The New Orleans office has not had a storied history with the Court in its compliance with the Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
Section 3020-a disciplinary appealsAustin v NYC Board of Education, 280 A.D.2d 365The Austin decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, sets out the standards followed by the courts in considering appeals from Section 3020-a disciplinary determinations. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:53 am by Diane Polscer
 The appellate court noted that while the policy defined the term “employee” the policy did not define the terms that comprised that definition: trustee, officer, employee, administrator or manager. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
Bandimere 17-475 Issue: Whether administrative law judges of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who act as hearing officers in administrative proceedings, are inferior officers under the appointments clause. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
As the Court said, individual states have the authority “to disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office” but not “federal offices, especially the Presidency. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Jessica Webb-Ayer
In Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court combined two cases challenging it—Burwell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
((…) This court issued its decision in Lee v. [read post]