Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2023, 1:59 pm
The Superior Court in eToll v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has granted Certification to the Borough of Harvey Cedars in the case of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:04 am
The jurisdiction of the Family Part of the New Jersey Superior Court to make orders determining custody is based upon the common law doctrine of parens patriae, which imposes upon the court an affirmative duty to protect the best interests of minor children. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:14 am
" A state supreme court decision is pending that will ultimately decide the issue of cities v. dispensaries. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
He hasn't been reversed by his superiors yet. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Similarly, accepting the petitioner's allegations as true and affording him the benefit of every favorable inference, the respondents failed to demonstrate that the petitioner does not have a cause of action for relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see Matter of O'Hara v Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Similarly, accepting the petitioner's allegations as true and affording him the benefit of every favorable inference, the respondents failed to demonstrate that the petitioner does not have a cause of action for relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see Matter of O'Hara v Board of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:14 am
The trial court found no standing and the Superior Court affirmed. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175, the court explained that "mandamus does not lie to enforce the performance of a duty that is discretionary, as opposed to ministerial. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175, the court explained that "mandamus does not lie to enforce the performance of a duty that is discretionary, as opposed to ministerial. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Freas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
That's the headline in today's MetNews about People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:09 am
Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
” The Court in Yellow Book Sales & Distribution Company, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
Trust Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Hayes v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 246 P.3d 877, 890 (Cal. 2011); see also Hinojos v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:27 pm
In the recently published case of the Superior Court of New Jersey in Ferrer v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Assn. of Tex. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:31 am
In doing so, the court applied the principles announced in Atalese v. [read post]
