Search for: "Does 1 - 64"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In this context it has to be underlined that the reduction of the concentrations of active substances does not lead to an improvement of the contraceptive efficiency but exclusively to avoiding or reducing the above mentioned secondary effects. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In principle, the parties should be informed on the new objections in writing, as soon as possible (T 433/93; T 1164/00; T 64/03).[1.3] In the present case the Board notes that the late submission and the admission of the new ground for opposition into the proceedings have not been mentioned in writing or orally. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
McDonald, 49 Hun 67, 1 N.Y. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
ViaCell, Inc., 491 F.3d 1342, 1363-64 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
NPR’s Nina Totenberg has coverage of both of yesterday’s arguments, as does JURIST. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They were not inspired by article 5(1)(f) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and it does not follow that, because detention would be permissible under article 5(1)(f), it is also permissible under United Kingdom law. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
He agreed to pay the sum in 64 monthly instalments. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
It held that Article 262 TFEU does not preclude the creation of the patent court system envisaged. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:08 am
Does anybody want to try this again? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
Hooters Offers Fake “Doctor’s Notes” to Skip Work During NCAA Tourney – from FMLA Insights Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination When sexting 64 times in 2 1/2 hours ISN’T sexual harassment – from Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog New Bill Bans Discrimination Against Unemployed – from Stephanie Thomas’s The Proactive Employer Blog From Cats Paw to Proximate Cause: A Short Trip? [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Where no diversity capability is required, a single A-D 52-1 could be utilized. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:55 am
Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563-64 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
Hopefully you can say both now and When I’m 64 that I Should Have Known Better. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
Somalia piracy—does wrong equal wrong? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
Knoll Golf Club, 64 N.J. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
For example, OHIM could allow communications by email, as the General Court does [What! [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
Art. 2(1) EPC). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
Co., 50 Ohio App.3d 1, 3 (1988) (citation omitted); see also Richland Valley Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Art. 64.01(b)(1)(B). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
The entire controversy doctrine does not require commonality of legal issues. [read post]
