Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 2161 - 2180 of 15,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Going through a laundry list is the same thing as requiring a digital photo. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Food and Drug Administration that discloses results of the environmental sampling that public health authorities completed during the Nov. 1, 2010 to Feb. 9, 2011 outbreak. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:48 am
SAT found that this was a transitional provision with a limited purpose and does not give any control. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm by Dan Murphy
Eluding can earn you one (1) to twelve (12) years in prison, depending on the outcome of your recklessness. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:02 am by Jonathan Bailey
Every year this article becomes the most popular article on the site through the month of December. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court dismissed the case under Rule 12 for failure to state a claim, but the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Chin and Bianco) reinstates the claim.How does this case fare under Littlejohn and Vega? [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Pursuant to that agreement, CS was to be recalculated effective July 1, 2006 after his graduation. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:12 am by Clerquette LeClerq
 12:35: Senator Durbin takes Judge Sotomayor on a stroll through her own, illustrious past. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:11 pm
If the answer to question 1 is yes, does Rule 23d(c) [now 28(c)j EPC forbid the patenting of claims directed to products (here: human embryonic stem cell cultures) which - as described in the application â€â [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
” As the judge noted, to have a cause of action under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,Halperin must plausibly allege that Defendants caused `a loss to 1 or more persons during any 1–year period . . . aggregating at least $5,000 in value. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court held that, at the pleading stage and accepting all allegations as true, plaintiffs adequately alleged that Dapper Labs violated Sections 5 and 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) by offering National Basketball Association (NBA) Top Shot Moments non-fungible tokens (Moments) without a registration statement. [read post]