Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2013, 9:33 pm
If the examiner maintains the rejection, Apple may file a notice of appeal to the PTAB [Patent Trials and Appeals Board] by June 29, 2013. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
On 24 January 2019, Hotel Cipriani S.P.A (‘Hotel Cipriani’) filed a revocation request against all of the goods designated to the contested EUTM, invoking Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:19 am
Section 204 does not address the measurement issue. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
On July 29, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Alabama, 13-1138 (limited to Question 1). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:32 am
Code § 636(b)(1)(B). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Playtex sells refills for the Diaper Genie, and so does Munchkin. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
(You can read Part-II here) [1] (1978) 2 SCC 213[2] SC to revisit Justice Krishna Iyer’s Landmark Judgment in Bangalore Water Supply case on Thursday, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 16, 2016, available at http://www.livelaw.in/sc-revisit-justice-krishna-iyers-landmark-judgment-bangalore-water-supply-case-thursday/[3] (2005) 5 SCC 1 [4] SC May Refer the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply Judgment for Reconsideration by a Nine-Judge Bench, LiveLaw.in, Nov. 17,… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
I always thought that to have a patent you had to take something and add to what nature does. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 9:26 pm
Ill., Sept. 29, 2006). [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
[The IPKat says that this question is badly phrased - does it refer to 1(i) or (ii)? [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:05 am
J. 1 *** C.R. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:32 am
Does this apply to restaurants too? [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
Id. at *29 (text added). [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:21 pm
See our April 1, 2011 post for more details. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Consent (Article 49(1)(a)). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:17 am
Employers have legal duties to workers regarding PPE under federal law that include the following: General Industry PPE 29 CFR 1910.132 (General requirements) 29 CFR 1910.133 (Eye and face protection) 29 CFR 1910.135 (Head protection) 29 CFR 1910.136 (Foot protection) 29 CFR 1910.137 (Electrical protective equipment) 29 CFR 1910.138 (Hand protection) 29 CFR 1910.140 (Personal Fall Protection) Construction PPE 29 CFR… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
SYLVIA HENRY v HARINGEY LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL 1/7/2010 29. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
