Search for: "Employee Benefit Systems, Inc." Results 2161 - 2180 of 2,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm by Angel Reyes
Ross Perot, Perot Systems Corp. founder   The difference between winning and losing is quitting. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
District Judge Charles Breyer raised concerns Friday that Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati may have a conflict of interest in litigation over options backdating at Brocade Communications Systems Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
These codifications and the resulting caste system became the foundations of the institutional barriers minorities continue to face today. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am by Doorey
The legislation stipulated that, to successfully claim mental stress benefits, an employee had to suffer “an acute reaction to a sudden and unexpected traumatic event. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
AFSCME,[133] which held that the government may not require government employees to contribute to unions, undermined these holdings. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney fee… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 6:16 pm by Rob Robinson
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this prospectus to “CS Disco,” “DISCO,” the “company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or similar terms refer to CS Disco, Inc. and its subsidiaries. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  The issues in the appeal were complicated and included questions regarding the time of accrual of the barratry claim and a disagreement over the applicable limitations period, the distinction between void and voidable contract, the interplay of the attorney disciplinary system with the civil justice system, and the ramifications of the rescission remedy for the litigant seeking it. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants allegedly marketed the clinics through their company, ARC Health, at malls and employee health fairs that targeted individuals insured by certain health care benefit programs. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants allegedly marketed the clinics through their company, ARC Health, at malls and employee health fairs that targeted individuals insured by certain health care benefit programs. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Some stakeholders told GAO that workers, applicants, and contractors may benefit from more outreach activities. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
"  "Community mental health centers are an essential element of the nation's health care system and serve vulnerable populations," said Daniel R. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., the United States Supreme Court limited the jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit to those cases where the patent claim is found in the initial complaint. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
Police are now investigating additional crime lab employees. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
A lawyer who is not afraid to say no (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) IP management for superior shareholder returns (Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) Whether litigation or negotiating, persuasive skills paramount (IP ADR Blog)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands Trade marks as commercial indicators – Guy Selby-Lowndes on valuable assistance business analysts can miss if they don’t pay attention to trade mark exploitation policy and official trade marks records (IP… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now, the background legal rule: Generally speaking the government may discipline (including firing) an employee based on the employee's speech if the speech is not said by the employee as part of the employee's job duties, Garcetti v. [read post]