Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 27,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 1:01 am
In the United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Such a claim may then still be viable under the Texas fair debt collection act. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Such a claim may then still be viable under the Texas fair debt collection act. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:04 pm
The United States alleges that Wheeling’s compensation to a number of employed and contracted physicians violated these statutory prohibitions because that compensation was based on the volume or value of the physicians’ referrals or was above fair market value. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Quill V. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:58 am
It is fair to say that the defense had a point… until you considered the full context.] [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
On Monday, June 21, the Supreme Court in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:58 am
Americash Loans, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:57 pm
Luther v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
Pennsylvania Plaintiffs filed a collective action to enforce the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
