Search for: "High v State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 35,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 11:10 am
In Markevicz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Moos and Anor) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 957 (Admin) – Read Judgment The High Court has decided that the actions of police in “kettling” climate change protestors during the G20 summit were unlawful. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a high profile abortion case-- June Medical Services v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The judge focused on Shaffer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Supreme Court review of a decision by the Iowa Supreme Court, rejecting the franchisor’s argument that a physical presence within the State of Iowa was a prerequisite to the state’s imposition of income tax on the franchisor (KFC Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In that challenge, McCormack v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm
Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
Since, as explained above, this point was conceded the Secretary of State for the purposes of the High Court decision, unless that issue is somehow revived, and then becomes the point on which the Supreme Court’s decision turns, a reference to the CJEU appears unlikely. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:24 pm
In Young v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Trevino v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
Louis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 5:30 pm
” The Directive cites Ranjan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am
In contrast, the Supreme Court was less cautious in its decision in Hamdan, in which it concluded that Common Article 3 applied to the conflict between the United States and al Qaida, even though that conflict does not occur solely in the territory of a High Contracting Party. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:03 am
United States, No. 14-6166. [read post]
