Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD" Results 2161 - 2180 of 5,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Benjamin Wittes
I haven't read it yet, but I'm very glad someone is doing this research. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
I would be interested to know whether this inaccuracy crept in. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:04 am by Todd Henderson
I’m skeptical the proof exists or will be discovered, but will be delighted to be proved wrong. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  They were also, especially in France, a response to specific legal issues, like divorce and inheritance—surely a child, an ex-wife, or a creditor shouldn’t just get to change an artist’s work to make it more marketable! [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:54 am by Cari Rincker
For the court to order supervised visitation, there must be a finding that the unsupervised visitation is adverse to the childs best interest. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
The court presumes that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, but either side can show that joint custody would, in fact, not be in the childs best interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:25 am by familoo
I’m always asked to review At A Glance by the publishers, Class Legal. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
I’m pretty sure that the shooter’s aim was not to validate anyone’s preexisting political stance. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
“I’m confident that irradiation would have prevented this current situation with flour. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
Or are there only fragmented communities of competing interests – strategic and commercial – operating behind a screen of feigned allegiance to laws and institutions? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am by Kevin
I mean, it’s not like I’m running for president here, so I feel obligated to know stuff before bothering you with opinions. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:47 am by Peter Mahler
The Romanoff Case A notable decision last month by Supreme Court Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:08 am by familoo
This is good stuff and I’m keen to share the good stuff as well as the desperately awful stuff which is so often in our feeds. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:16 pm by familoo
Should be good – I’m told that so far there are quite a few professionals who have signed up – it would be good to ensure that some members of the wider public attend – so if you think it sounds interesting do book. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I admit I’m not sure what the difference is here—this seems like the court in Cariou singling out five of Prince’s collages. [read post]