Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2007, 8:54 pm
The only time the court may not render an order based on a mediated settlement agreement is in the very narrow situation when one of the parents is (a) a victim of domestic violence and (b) that past domestic violence has caused the person to psychologically not be able to make decisions that are in a child’s best interest. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:25 am
To me, whether it's Wrangler or Linebacker, if you don't change from the same, failed strategies you spell it the same way: B-O-O-N-D-O-G-G-L-E. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:54 am
PatrickMichael D. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:47 am
A child is considered disabled if he or she meets the definition of disability found at section 1614(a)(3) of the Act. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
X and the Health Service Executive"Request by parent for access to child's hospital records - whether release would best serve the interests of the child - section 28(6)" -The Commissioner annulled the decision of the HSE and made a new decision to grant the request for access to the child's hospital records.Case 050338 - Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 6:02 am
The Court also found that the evidence supported the family court's finding that the termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the child under KRS 625.090(3)(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:51 am
The Court also found that the evidence supported the family court's finding that the termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the child under KRS 625.090(3)(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 1:20 am
(d) The needs of each party based on the standard of living established during the marriage. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
FenchelWilliam D. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Moreover, I am interested in how you'd argue the question of harm: does look [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 8:57 am
Hawk wants to kill Boots, the Ukrainians responsibe for shooting him — and he’d like to have someone pay money toward the surviving child of the man he was supposed to protect. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:25 pm
I would think that'd be no different than chatting up a child molester online, and you'd only have your investigator monitoring the site, not even necessarily engaging in conversation. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:25 am
NOTE TO READERS: Have you had an interesting or notable sentencing recently? [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:13 am
"I'd come out with an announcement," Henry Nicholas said. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:49 pm
Is it (a) withdraw from the representation of the client and advise her to seek objective counsel; (b) withdraw from the representation and engage counsel of his own to litigate the paternity claim; (c) withdraw from the representation, engage his own counsel, and appoint a guardian pro tem for the child; or (d) all of the above, while also retaining complete confidentiality of the client's information, including any client information that affects his personal… [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
October 13, 2006Re: Reposting A Blog On An American Third Party.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 4:40 am
With Ross' permission (Ihope), I'd like to share it with everyone. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 8:44 pm
I'm going to go with mental overload because I refuse to cede the power to communicate to B of A musak. [read post]
