Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
The mother tried to show mootness by arguing that even if the court of appeals reversed, the district court could not issue a "re-return" order under the Convention, Scottish courts would ignore the re-return order, or she was not subject to enforcement of that order in Scotland. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:51 am by Legal Talk Network
In the second half of the show, our hosts suggest reaching for your tablet if you're looking for better ways to present and also offer some great general tips on presenting PowerPoint and Keynote slideshows. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
At the same time, we’re taking a proactive approach to budgeting and stewardship so that we are more resilient. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:15 am by Rob Howse
   Though reviled by conservatives, were not FDR and more recently Ted Kennedy masters of compromise and coalition-building, knowing when to push forward and when to back off? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:25 pm
The Supreme Court Justices: Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan are all there. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Mary L. Dudziak
It also included a more outlandish proposal to re-introduce a modern form of slavery in order to replicate the social regulatory function of military service. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  If so, you’re already one up on Arters. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 8:33 am by Jeff Foust
“And that’s where we are and that’s where we’re going to stay. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Stephen Wermiel
  They were a mix of four of the six Catholics on the Court – Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas – and two of the three Jews on the Court – Justices Breyer and Kagan. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  How can there be a “controversy,” one might wonder, if the parties are in alignment on the question they’re asking the Court to resolve? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:26 am by Robert Kraft
“If the answer to that is no, that’s telling me the people who know the patient best have made a decision that they’re not safe,” said Kennedy, who offers “to be the bad cop” for families or primary care physicians having trouble delivering the news. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:14 am by Ronald Mann
  Webre’s argument was noteworthy for the best quip of the day, Scalia’s joking allusion to the indeterminacy of arising-under doctrine – “we’re making it up anyway, right? [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:55 am by Mike Madison
., with Justices Sotomayor and Kennedy dissenting. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 8:26 am by Rory Little
Justice Kennedy similarly appeared to suggest that the Court stick to the narrow question presented. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:29 am by Jon Robinson
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 2:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
  He's out not because of our system of what Paul Kennedy calls "(in)justice." [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
It will also be a major part of Justice Kennedy's legacy. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:26 pm by Dennis
Also still available, The Lawyer’s Guide to Collaboration Tools and Technologies: Smart Ways to Work Together, by Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell. [read post]