Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Yet arguments of a conflict between copyright law and the First Amendment in the United States are relatively new — understanding why the two co-existed for nearly two centuries before these arguments began to appear should prove valuable to current scholarship. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
James, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender PDP; Tina N. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
” Chancellor Strine, however, appears to be that rare species of jurist who, unlike the majority of the United States Supreme Court, understands the reality of contingent fee litigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:24 pm
The recent Sixth Circuit case of McKelvey v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
Secretary of United States Army, No. 10-1172 (Dec. 14, 2011). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in three cases, two of which present similar issues. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1997)) and state courts (Richardson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:03 pm
The debate pits James Ho, counsel for the University of Texas in the case, and Loren Alikhan, counsel for the League of United Latin American Citizens (arguing for the University’s position) against Gail Heriot of the US Commission on Civil Rights and Roger Clegg of the Center for Equal Opportunity (arguing that the university’s plan is unconstitutional). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:11 am
United States, the 4-1-4 opinion articulated two tests for when a wetland constitutes a water of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
This is a startling question at first, because Horwich is appearing on behalf of the United States, and the FDA obviously is the agency most affected by the case. [read post]
