Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2006, 8:22 am
Justice Kennedy concurred and Justices Stevens and Ginsburg dissented.Filed in: cases, SupremeCourt, Washington-v-Recuenco, Blakely-v-Washington, sentencing, , firearms-enhancement [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm
Justice Scalia wrote for five justices--himself, the Chief, Kennedy, Thomas, and Sotomayor--holding that a search occurred because the government trespassed in installing the GPS device and adopting a property-based conception of the Fourth Amendment that he argues prevailed until Katz in 1967 and that exists as a complementary approach to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:59 am
Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kennedy joined. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:25 am
John Roberts was appointed at age 50, Samuel Alito at age 55, Steven Breyer at 56, Clarence Thomas at 43, David Souter at 51, Anthony Kennedy at 52, and Antonin Scalia at 50.The idea of kicking someone upstairs to become a Supreme Court Justice, however, is not unprecedented. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:14 am
Justice Breyer was joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg and Alito. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
And he didn’t seem to have many insights into the character of Clarence Thomas at the time of this book’s writing. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:21 am
In addition to Professor Strauss, the participants included Richard Falk, David Kennedy, Thomas Franck, Gregory Fox, Robert Johansen, Leila Sadat. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the majority Opinion, joined by Justices Alito, Kennedy, and Thomas, and Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas joined in the majority opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:34 pm
” Leading guilty parties include authors of Supreme Court opinions from a 6-3 majority of current Justices: Breyer, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Scalia, Sotomayor, Thomas–though not Alito, who has had a chance (in 2010’s Stolt-Nielson opinion), or Kagan or Roberts, who haven’t. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:05 am
Both before and after Justice Scalia's ruminations, which only Justices Kennedy and Thomas joined, courts have struggled with this question. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:50 am
Justice Thomas, also concurring, explained why he would overrule Basic. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:23 am
(To read the bill, search for "HR 2460" on the Library of Congress's THOMAS website.) [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 9:24 pm
Justice Thomas isn’t particularly fond of the limelight (or the english language) which makes the Court a uniquely awkward experience for him. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
It takes only four of the justices to agree to review a case, and we can safely count Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito as very property friendly, and Justice Kennedy and Chief Justice Roberts are moderately property friendly. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, went further, suggesting that the cases upon which the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:25 am
" Justice Alito, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Kennedy, concurred, clarifying that the government could have proved that once the cash got to Mexico that had the effect of being concealed, but in this case the government failed to produce such evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
Four Justices (Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia) held that they cannot. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
Speaking of David, he writes in his blog today that Judge Sydney Thomas of the 9th Circuit is being vetted by the White House for Justice Stevens seat. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:19 pm
Some of them: William Rehnquist - intellectually lazy and politically partisan; Sandra Day O'Connor - unprincipled and impatient; Antonin Scalia - bullying advocacy in lieu of reasoned analysis, naked bias for the Republican Party; Anthony Kennedy - basic judicial ineptitude compounded by empty rhetoric; Clarence Thomas - sullen withdrawal and reflexive partisanship; Stephen Breyer - favouring muddleheaded compromise. [read post]
