Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
” Data Privacy and Data Protection The House of Lords will be debating an amendment to the U.K. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court has this paradigm case pending before it (Morrison v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Now, in a refreshingly short and direct speech of just 37 paragraphs, Lord Sumption put things right. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
As Lord Reid explained in that case, at p 1033, Julius v Bishop of Oxford 5 App Cas 214 is itself authority for going behind the words which confer a statutory power to the general scope and objects of the Act in order to find what was intended. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
On Wednesday 23rd November, the Court will hand down judgment in the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Isn't it wrong for me to change my opinion simply because one of the victims stiffed a drug lord? [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The judge stated clearly that the Al Rawi principles applied in the current case. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:30 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
On the other hand the House of Lords in Scandecor Developments AB v Scandecor Marketing AB seemed rather inclined to validate bare licensing. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
She then gave the example of the WHO’s FluNet as an instance of international collaboration between private enterprise, government and charities which bears potential to be encouraged.Following the presentations, Lord Justice Arnold sparked a discussion on compulsory licensing and tailored remedies, noting that eBay v MercExchange e [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
Lord Mance, in giving the lead judgment, stated that: “the only approach, consistent with the nature and underlying purpose of these insurances both before and after the [1969 Act], is one which looks to the initiation or causation of the accident or disease which injured the employee. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was already a possession order and, on the state of the law at that time (pre Knowsley HT v White in the House of Lords), there could be no legitimate expectation of getting an assured tenancy as the AST would have been ended. [read post]
