Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
I HATE THE LORD GOD FOR GIVING YOU LIFE!!!!!!!!! [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Neuberger, delivering the judgment of the Court, stated that whether a party was 'making' something was a "a matter of fact and degree". [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
By Dennis Crouch Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
And this actually should make sense in connection with Roe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:28 pm
Lord Justice Richards (with whom Lord Justice Sullivan and the Master of the Rolls agreed) delivered the judgment, which concerned Google's liability for comments posted on the very blogging platform which hosts also the IPKat, ie Blogger. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
However, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2006] UKHL 44 he was described by Lord Hoffmann as being “hostile to the spirit of Reynolds” and his finding in favour of the Saudi Arabian businessman was reversed, the House of Lords finding that qualified privilege did apply. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
United States: A Haitian-American journalist has been ordered to never again publish anything about the prime minister of Haiti [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Court of Session Judge Lord Drummond Young rules lawyer had his ‘human rights’ breached by Law Society over complaint row. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
These points lead me to agree very strongly with Lord Woolf when he says that there is a good deal of sense in more research being conducted into juries to help judges better advise jurors. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
I, III, IV and V could be changed and have the resulting entity still be worthy of the name "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
Some of the social reversals included the lords of the house serving the slaves. [read post]
Hanging By A Thread: Reportage and Clause 4 of the Defamation Bill – Sophie Walker and Jason Bosland
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
In the seminal cases of Al-Fagih v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Lord Puttnam said: “The amendments in my name and the names of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd, and the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Scotland, do exactly what they say on the tin. [read post]
