Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
 It would have been interesting to have heard the panellists views on the recenty decision by the CJEU in BestWater International GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am by Antonio Zuccaro
  First, the genre of struggle music will be circumscribed and differentiated from other politically motivated music. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/k664TmtgLU -> Link to Google petition for leave to SCOTUS in the Oracle v Google case http://t.co/prM02I6rch -> CRTC posts FAQ on CASL Requirements for Installing Computer Programs http://t.co/SA0OvlEJP3 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-10: Public and private cooperation necessary to fight cybercrim… http://t.co/e101WUh7Xu -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-10 http://t.co/2PSbSKkr6G -> Supreme Court of Canada to rule… [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
” Mount Zion Church of God in Christ v Garden City, KS, 6:14-cv-01361-CM-KGS (D. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
” Mount Zion Church of God in Christ v Garden City, KS, 6:14-cv-01361-CM-KGS (D. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
(The latter website *totally* has theme music, which is, appropriately enough, Elton John’s “Philadelphia Freedom. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:13 am by admin
National Ass’n of Teachers of Singing (“NATS”) The NATS Code of Ethics stated that members cannot “either by inducement, innuendo, or other acts, proselytize students of other teachers”. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 1:43 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision in Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Ben
The bill reached the attention of lawmakers by way of a citizen’s initiative following a highly-publicised case in which anti-piracy authorities fined a 10-year old girl for illegally downloading pop music on to her home computer. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Jani
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Fabio pictured while wonderingabout the implementation costsof the blocking order just issued against himFollowing last week's judgment in Cartier v BSkyB [here, a case concerning the possibility of requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to block, or at least impede, access by their subscribers to websites that advertise and sell counterfeit goods] this morning Arnold J returned to the more traditional ecosystem for blocking injunctions in the UK, ie copyright… [read post]