Search for: "Minor v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 14,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
 But the decision to amend an opinion and publish it doesn't constitute a minor change. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm
The Court found in Regents of the University of Michigan v Titan that the one-year-back rule for insurance claims has taken on new meaning for incompetents and minors. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
 Justice Emerson’s decision, which pre-figured by several years the Second Department’s landmark opinion in 1545 Ocean Avenue, held that Bonanni’s reliance on the grounds for dissolution available to oppressed minority shareholders under Business Corporation Law § 1104-a did not state a valid claim for relief under LLC Law § 702 governing judicial dissolution of LLCs. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
 Justice Emerson’s decision, which pre-figured by several years the Second Department’s landmark opinion in 1545 Ocean Avenue, held that Bonanni’s reliance on the grounds for dissolution available to oppressed minority shareholders under Business Corporation Law § 1104-a did not state a valid claim for relief under LLC Law § 702 governing judicial dissolution of LLCs. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Summary of Decision issued September 29, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Anderson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:45 pm
Last September, a 17-year-old woman known as Jane Doe arrived in the United States and discovered she was pregnant. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:36 am by David Markus
But Breyer boldly presses on, citing a congressional committee report stating that the law in question was designed to enhance a defendant’s penalty “if they had a prior conviction for sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Furthermore, the wife was granted custody of two minor sons. [read post]